teleidoplex (
teleidoplex) wrote2007-08-18 08:18 pm
Bette Davis didn't have this problem
Y'know, most of the time I think Robin Hobb is bit of a crackpot with her somewhat luddite stance regarding the internet and writers:
http://www.robinhobb.com/rant.html
but then something happens like today, where I sit down to take a brief break from writing, and end up spending an hour on Youtube because I found some new and cool thing and got distracted.
Today's distraction: Speed Painting.
This one's my favorite. Fricken' Mascara, man!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sahHSNy_Uk
Uh. Back to work. I'm pretty sure I have a character's life to screw over. That's easily as fun as speed painting, right?
(for the record, I love Robin's work, I just think she's a little too on the "what's bad for me is bad for everyone else" side of the fence).
http://www.robinhobb.com/rant.html
but then something happens like today, where I sit down to take a brief break from writing, and end up spending an hour on Youtube because I found some new and cool thing and got distracted.
Today's distraction: Speed Painting.
This one's my favorite. Fricken' Mascara, man!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sahHSNy_Uk
Uh. Back to work. I'm pretty sure I have a character's life to screw over. That's easily as fun as speed painting, right?
(for the record, I love Robin's work, I just think she's a little too on the "what's bad for me is bad for everyone else" side of the fence).
no subject
And I have to agree with the Robin Hobb is a little crazy right now comment. I think anyone who can manage their time can manage a blog.
Now online RPs on the other hand... Those are DANGEROUS. ;) I find myself participating in those more than writing most f the time. It's that instant gratification thing. >.<
I'm so not that way about any blogs, tho.
no subject
http://community.livejournal.com/jeenk_icons/23727.html
no subject
I found it amusing. And fairly true for me, anyway. Doesn't mean I'm gonna stop blogging.
no subject
Heh.
no subject
Not to mention her condescending evaluation of what blogging is worth, in the grand scheme of things.
no subject
Well, I'm not drinking that Kool-Aid.
She's also anti-fanfic. That's strike two. I swear, if I didn't love the character of the Fool so much (even if s/he did get a rather shafteriffic ending)...
no subject
no subject
{snip}
May I write fan-fiction based on your characters or set in your world?
No. I do not permit fan-fiction.
I've created artwork based on your characters or world. Can I display it on my website?
Yes.
I read that you allow fan art but not fan fiction. That's not fair! Why do you do that?
Fan art can never be confused with my writing. Art is pictures (or sculptures, etc.) It isn't words on a page. No one will look at a picture of a wolf and say, "That is Robin Hobb's work." Even if you Google for Robin Hobb and Nighteyes, and that image comes up, no one will think it is a page of text from my book. It's that simple."
{snip}
Apparently, there was a very long and somewhat famous rant. It used to be at the link that the Blog rant is now on. I found a copy of it here:
http://www.whedon.info/The-Fan-Fiction-Rant-buffy-mention.html
It's a long rant, but basically it comes down to:
1. Fanfic is similar to identity theft, with creative rather than economic repercussions.
2. Fanfic is an insult to the original author's creative intent.
3. Fanfic helps people become good writers about as much as coloring Barbie's hair green in a coloring book helps kids become great artists.
4. Writing Fanfic is like being an Elvis impersonator your whole life, instead of going out and becoming a performer in your own right.
To be fair, on this matter of ficcing her own works, I respect her request. Most people do (I don't know of any fics out there with her characters... although I haven't really gone looking because I take respecting her request as not *reading* as well as not writing). Once again, where I get rubbed a little raw is when she takes things out of the realm of her own preferences and makes sweeping, morally righteous claims. It's my understanding that she also comes across as very pugnacious and intractable in discussion on this matter. So, I guess you just gotta nod your head and let her be. Still, I'm insulted on behalf of:
1. People who believe mimicry is the best form of flattery, not a way to run up your creative credit and stick you with the bills
2. People who intend to insult the author's creative intent... like critics! Where's the love?
3. Kids who colored Barbie's hair green and found the experience rich and fulfilling for a variety of reasons that may or may not have anything to do with ambitions to become serious artists.
4. Elvis Impersonators.
...especially Elvis Impersonators.
no subject
no subject
no subject
(We're agreeing on the broad point; I'm just being nitpicky on the approach. I blame the fact that I'm editing MNC right now.)
no subject